| Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's |
|
I’ve bumped my YAKINDU vote to 5 and we’re good. I’ve tagged it. Now we have 5 over budget :p. :D From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sven Efftinge On Nov 24, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
I'm ok with not having it.
We also talked about the YAKINDU talk at the meeting. As Sven mentioned and confirm with my modeling background, statecharts are really the only useful visual
modeling paradigm J. But it’s sitting below 3.2 which
makes me uncomfortable (unless it happens to climb ;)). Yes, as I said during the call. The technology is very good and advanced and they solve real problems in the embedded domain. Also it's open-source and they even want to move it to Eclipse. So given that we have too few talks in embedded and modeling, this might be a good choice. I already gave all I have :-) Sven
:D From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sven Efftinge On Nov 24, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Ian Skerrett wrote:
I thought we agreed on including up to 3.25 votes. That would include : Jan gave that talk also at EclipseCon and it was totally crowded. He's a great speaker and he has a lot to say about that topic. I like this one, since although as modeling talk it's rather code centric and it discusses the heavy use of singletons in EMF. Might be bit controversial, which is good. Not 3.25 and not my cup of tea, but well known presenters : If we'd include those three we would have 16 including the early pick. I think that's fair given the initially allocated 20 talks Sven
Definitely and I don’t want it to have so much weight that we trade off good talks with marginal talks. I am putting a PC tag called ‘in1’ on all the talks that currently make the cut. You can filter on that keyword and see the list. Right this minute there are
73 based on our discussions this morning. Once we filter out duplicates and speaker overload and topic overload we may even have room to add one or two more. I’ll keep tweaking the list as we go. And we’ll bring up talks to add and remove from that list here.
Please don’t add or remove the tag yourselves. Thanks for all the hard work gang. We’re doing pretty good. And have a great Thanksgiving to our American friends! Doug. From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ian Skerrett fwiw, the specifically labeled the allocation 'rough' since I expected it not to be exact. I guess in the end we can only pick 63, given the five early birds and two director picks. Also note your list has 20 for tools/other
but Ian's only had 18.
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
--
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
-- _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ |