Agreed, and we have already started the horse trading.
By five, I mean talks with a five vote but has been dragged down by a number of 2 and 3 votes. I’m just trying to figure out what that means. We’ll go through
some examples at the meeting.
Doug.
From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:40 AM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It’s easy to look yourselves. Just sort by PC Vote and see what the top 63 are. Right now there’s
a big tie at 3.5. And we’re heavy in Tools and light in most of the others, which is pretty normal since Tools is a grab bag.
I’m still munching through some things to see how I want to present the list. I’ll set up a webex
for the meeting and we can look together.
Last year we went through the "5's" fairly quickly. It was difficult to get the last 25% or so talks finalized... but that's always how it is. I think people should be prepared to do some horse-trading if they have some talks they really
want to get in.
--
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719
