fwiw, the specifically labeled the
allocation 'rough' since I expected it not to be exact.
On 11/23/2011 1:49 PM, John Arthorne wrote:
I
guess in the end we can only pick 63, given the five early
birds and two director picks. Also note your list has 20
for tools/other but Ian's only had 18.
Based
on our review today of the available submissions, I
definitely think we need to give more to Tools. I'll just
throw out how I would allocate FWIW, based on the
submissions we have (obviously Doug and Ian have the final
say here). Basically this removes 4 from modelling, 2 from
mobile, and gives 6 more to tools/other.
Modelling
- 15 + 1 early bird
Platform
- 9 + 1 early bird
Mobile
- 8
Tools/Other
- 22 + 2 early bird
RT
- 9 + 1 early bird
John
BTW,
heres the breakdown by category of talks with > 3.5.
Modelling
8 / 20
Platform
8 / 10
Mobile
3 / 10
Tools,
Comm, Cool 37 / 20
Eclipse
RT 7 / 10
From:
eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:45 AM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's
Agreed,
and we have already started the horse trading.
By
five, I mean talks with a five vote but has been dragged
down by a number of 2 and 3 votes. Im just trying to
figure out what that means. Well go through some examples
at the meeting.
Doug.
From:
eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:40 AM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Its
easy to look yourselves. Just sort by PC Vote and see what
the top 63 are. Right now theres a big tie at 3.5. And
were heavy in Tools and light in most of the others,
which is pretty normal since Tools is a grab bag.
Im
still munching through some things to see how I want to
present the list. Ill set up a webex for the meeting and
we can look together.
Last year we went through the "5's" fairly quickly. It was
difficult to get the last 25% or so talks finalized... but
that's always how it is. I think people should be prepared
to do some horse-trading if they have some talks they really
want to get in.
--
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
