Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Scheduling done- please t

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, I looked, and from what I could
tell, the webtools ones look about like what I had requested. 

Except, I noticed a few of my "short
talks" were not scheduled yet .... what's up with that? 
There's no danger of them not being
scheduled, right? 

Also, on the long talk pages, it looked
like there was a number of "open slots" ... like 5 or 7. 
Does that mean we can squeak in one
more? (Recall that I still have one in "wait list" status, if

we have the space). 

Thanks,

From:	"Gabe O'Brien" <gabe.obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Eclipsecon Program Committee list <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	01/18/2008 01:19 PM
Subject:	Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Scheduling        done-        please        take a look ASAP

---

The scheduling tool is now fixed so anyone on the
program committee can 
see the schedule without having to log into the wiki first. If you have
any other issue please let me know.

Thanks
Gabe O'Brien

LINK:
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2008/schedulingtool/

Gaff, Doug wrote:
>
> Sorry about that guys. There’s clearly an access right problem.
>
> Bjorn: can you fix this for the PC members?
>
> *From:* eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Jeff McAffer
> *Sent:* Friday, January 18, 2008 8:49 AM
> *To:* Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> *Subject:* Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Scheduling
> done- please take a look ASAP
>
>
> similarly I get to the login page, and appear to login successfully
> (nothing saying I did not) but whenever I go back to that page or
> paste in the original URL I get the login prompt again.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> *Peter Kriens <Peter.Kriens@xxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 01/18/2008 02:14 AM
>
> Please respond to
> Eclipsecon Program Committee list 
> <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>                  
>
> To
>
>                  
>
> Eclipsecon Program Committee list 
> <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> cc
>
>                  
>
> Subject
>
>                  
>
> Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Scheduling done - 
> please take a look ASAP
>
>
>                  
>
>
>
>
> I can login to the website but I do not have enough privileges to
see 
> this page ...
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Peter Kriens
>
> On 18 jan 2008, at 04:07, Gaff, Doug wrote:
>
> Hi PC,
>
> I’ve finished scheduling the accepted talks. Most of this was done
> before the holidays, but I had a few more things to wrap up. The 
> process I followed is below in case you’re interested.
>
> There isn’t a lot of time to make major changes, but I need each
> category lead to *review the ordering of your talks* to make sure
I 
> didn’t make any mistakes in order or speaker overlap (hit the swap
> button to see speakers). If you want to reorder anything, I need to
> hear *before this coming Monday*. You can view (but not edit) the
> schedule here:
>
> https://www.eclipsecon.org/2008/schedulingtool/
>
> The username/pw is the same one you use for the submission system.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> _Tutorials_
>
> Group categories as much as possible, avoid speaker overlap, and use
> recommended ordering from category leads.
>
> _Longs/Shorts_
>
> Optimize for:
> · no speaker overlap
> · no category talk overlap
> · minimal repeat category parallelism (e.g. Eclipse and OSGi talks
> aren’t always in parallel)
> · even distribution of categories over the three days
> · specific talk ordering as recommended by category leads
> · panels in the theatre
>
> I generated the breakdown in Excel for longs/shorts to figure out
> grouping. Then I went to the online tool and dropped things into 
> place. I reordered based on my best guess at room size needs. I also
> looked for speaker overlap and side-by-side speakers on shorts. I
may 
> have missed something between long and shorts, although because I
> didn’t allow category overlap and I checked Philippe closely, I 
> probably haven’t missed very many.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list_
> _eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>_
> _https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>   

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee