Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-pmc] Issues with missing CQ entries...

The exact nature of the corrective measures you take are up to you. I recommend killing the EclipseWorld presentation directory and opening CQs on everything else.

The IP Policy is pretty clear, however. You need to have a CQ for anything that is distributed from an property. This includes VCS and the downloads server.

AFAIK, we have no CQ for Struts. It looks like it can be reasonably classified as a test dependency [1] (in every place it's found except for the EclipseWorld presentation).



On 05/31/2012 12:42 PM, Nitin Dahyabhai wrote:
Maybe I'm overlooking the obvious, but for those that genuinely don't have 
a CQ, what are the corrective measures to take?  Is there anything we 
should be doing beyond opening a CQ?  Should we be removing them instead? 
Does our proximity to Juno's release affect things (other than being past 
the general deadline for CQs)?  At least one copy of struts.jar has been 
there since 2005.

Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP Source Editing and JSDT
IBM Rational

wtp-pmc mailing list

Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

Back to the top