| This appears to be a bug of some sort.   The same thing started
    happening to me recently with various Eclipse reporting tools. 
    Wasn't sure if I was the only one.  I've only had this issue in
    Firefox, but it might just be a problem with the browser cache. 
    I've hopped over to Chrome to work around the issue a couple of
    times and have had success. 
 Neil
 
 On 5/29/2012 8:41 PM, David M Williams wrote:
 I can access that
        page, itself, and I can
        "see" some subsets of "webtools", like "webtools.incubator"
        "webtools.releng" (the few I tried), but if I select "webtools"
        itself in the long list of projects, I am asked to login again.
        That's
        what made me think it was related to committer rights. And, I'm
        guessing
        it is the "webtools" "container" project that has the
        interesting long list of oddities. 
      Thanks,
 
 
 
 
 
 From:      
         Wayne Beaton
        <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 To:      
         wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
 Date:      
         05/29/2012 08:25 PM
 Subject:    
           Re: [wtp-pmc]
        Issues with missing CQ entries...
 Sent by:    
           wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
 Any committer should be able to access this page.
        You
        should be able to access it.
 
 http://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/downloads.php?id=webtools
 
 Please confirm: can you access this page?
 
 Wayne
 
 On 05/29/2012 06:47 PM, David M Williams wrote:
 I can't "see" that report ... my guess it
          my committer ID was removed from the "umbrella" group, as well
          as the more specific groups?
 
 But in researching it, I discovered that we, webtools, have
          the first 8
          CQs ever put in the IPZilla database ... how's that for a
          dubious honor?
          :)
 
 While I can't see the report, I see that "webtools area" is
          defined
          as
 /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/webtools/
 
 I think in the past we've only focused on "what we release"
          which
          would be what's under
 /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops
 
 So, it wouldn't surprise me if there was stuff up there that
          we never really
          'released' and was put up there before "we" knew what we were
          doing [such as for the tutorials, tests, build tools, etc.]
          But, agree
          with Wayne (Wayne is always right, correct? :) that "anything
          on downloads"
          should be IP Clean ... and we've just never scrubed it
          ourselves, but sounds
          like Wayne is now.
 
 Without seeing the list, hard to know what to recommend ... if
          to "get
          rid" of some of the old stuff (leaving a polite webpage in its
          place,
          explaining it was removed due to age) or to push ahead and get
          CQ clearance
          (eventually) even though its not stuff we "release".I'd lean
          toward the former, but ... without seeing the list, I would
          not follow
          my advice :/
 
 Naci might know about some of the tutorials/education material
          and if any
          of that is still useful/valid?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From:         Chuck Bridgham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
 To:         wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
 Date:         05/29/2012 02:29 PM
 Subject:         [wtp-pmc] Issues with missing CQ entries...
 Sent by:         wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 Wayne emailed me earlier today as he was browsing through our IP
        log submission,
        and discovered potentially a large amount of
 third party libraries that are not tied to CQ's.
 
 If you follow this link:   http://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/downloads.php?id=webtools
 
 Along with the large amount of test or sample files that are
        included in
        our junits or documentation, we also have many files that may
        need attention
         (axis, ant, commons, derby, jsr*, wsdl,  etc...)
 
 I'm going to send a note today for everyone to take a second
        look at this
        particular report.
 
 David - Since most of these "problems" are ancient file
        references,
        Is this a case of missing CQ entries?   do we simply need to map
        them
        somehow?
 
 
 Thanks - Chuck
 
 Senior Architect, RAD Java EE Tools, WTP PMC Lead
 IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC _______________________________________________
 wtp-pmc mailing list
 wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 wtp-pmc mailing list
 wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
 
 
 --
 Wayne Beaton
 The Eclipse Foundation
 Twitter: @waynebeaton
 Explore Eclipse
            Projects_______________________________________________
 wtp-pmc mailing list
 wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
 |