Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[soa-iwg] Minutes of the SOA Initiative weekly update - November 25, 2009

Attendees:

Donald Smith, Eclipse Foundation

Ricco Deutscher, Sopera

Falko Riemenschneider, Itemis

Stephane Drapeau, Obeo

Zsolt Beothy-Elo, Sopera

 

Please send any errors or omissions to these minutes. 

 

Agenda:

-          Charter – Donald is still reviewing ways to update the charter to be more inclusive of contributions from people looking to support just runtimes, deployments and/or tools.

-          Media launch – criteria for media launch, home page link, etc:

o   Need at least 1 “big” vendor on board and willing to help with Press and Analyst briefings

o   No time frame – i.e., not waiting for any particular event or date.

-          Wiki Page

o   Agreement with Scotts suggestion we need a wiki page to track meeting minutes, etc.

o   Minutes, call information, link from IWG page

o   Don will implement a first pass and link to the group.

 

-          Don

 

 

From: soa-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Donald Smith
Sent: November 18, 2009 1:37 PM
To: 'SOA Industry Working Group'
Subject: [soa-iwg] Minutes of the SOA Initiative weekly update - November 18, 2009

 

Please send any errors or omissions to these minutes. 

 

Attendees:

Donald Smith, Eclipse Foundation

Ricco Deutscher, Sopera

Falko Riemenschneider, Itemis

 

Regrets:

Stephane Drapeau, Obeo

Prasad Yendluri, SoftwareAG

Zsolt Beothy-Elo, Sopera

 

Minutes

-          Who should be able to edit the website:

1.       Any steering committee member can appoint someone with CVS access to eclipse.org/eclipsesoa

2.       Ideally someone already able to edit an eclipse project page and understand basic PHP and HTML

-          Update of the charter – Discussion about updating the charter to allow logo use on broader circumstances (i.e., people choosing to bundle tools/deployment with their own runtime, and vice versa.

1.       Donald to take look at charter from perspective of membership versus logo use

2.       Ricco to consider possibility of sub-marks denoting if a product is just using a facet of the package (tools, deployment, and/or runtime).

3.       Goals are – to ensure the IWG doesn’t create a bundle of largely incompatible software, while trying to ensure an open environment for broader participation.

 

 

 

-          Don

 


Back to the top