[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : Re: Ratified Implementations and special designation in the eyes of users
|
First, we /are/ investing in decoupling from GlassFish. For example,
the TCK is just about free of the build-time requirement that was
identified as an issue. I would expect that to be completed in time
for use during the 9.1 release.
Listing the compatible implementations included for each ballot
might suffice.
From my perspective -- we want to provide perks for
implementations are willing and able to get on, and stay on these
trains. They enable us to move the Spec. forward on the community
schedule. It is a lot of work, on speculation and on a schedule
that might not be of their choosing.
-- Ed
On 2/10/2021 7:23 PM, David Blevins
wrote:
Under the first heading (the Spec. name and
version) on the specification page add all implementations
that are included as part of the ratification.
On that suggestion, do you think mentioning them explicitly
in the Release Review section would be sufficient?
Putting them at the very top of the page above all the
Compatible Implementations to me is less optimal than the
original star proposal.
-David
