Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ide-dev] Ctrl-1 driven development

I certainly buy-in, not just for CDT but for as much of the IDE as I can
cover. I am building a CDT-based product and using CDT with my Arduino and
Raspberry Pi boards at home, but I’m also involved in some significant
cloud development at work (browser front ends working with vert.x java and
java micro service on the backend) for which I’m using Eclipse as a user.
I love Eclipse for all of this and, while yes there are areas where it
needs work, especially for browser front ends and there is work going on
there in WTP, I’d be happy to share my enthusiasm and help get the word


On 2015-10-15, 9:31 AM, "ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Marc
Khouzam" <ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>CDT definitely would benefit from a better website.  I have hope it would
>help lower the barrier-to-entry for C/C++ developers to use eclipse as
>well as keep users informed and interested.
>I can also allocate some time to help with the content and maintenance.
>Doug is better than me at choosing what is interesting or not as content,
>but I'll help in whatever way I can. And I completely leave the graphical
>design to the experts.
>Thanks for the possible help Ian!
>From: ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf
>of Ian Skerrett [ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: October 15, 2015 8:18 AM
>To: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ide-dev] Ctrl-1 driven development
>>> What if we did a standard IDE web page that JDT and CDT could both use.
>>> Of course the key challenge is someone would need to provide the
>>> content and then maintain it.
>> I think that would be a good start. I¹m certainly interested in
>> contributing where I can. But I really need a template to work with to
>> compensate for my lack of talent in the graphic arts :).
>> I personally don¹t think this is good use of the FEEP funds. I¹d rather
>> see that money go towards fixing bugs that are really annoying users or
>> small features that add lots of value for users.
>FWIW, I agree that FEEP should be used for fixing bugs. I can pay for
>the design work out of my marketing budget. However, I need to get
>buy-in from JDT and CDT that they will 1) provide and maintain the
>content, and 2) participate in the design process.
>ide-dev mailing list
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
>ide-dev mailing list
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit

Back to the top