[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ide-dev] Yet another article advising to leave Eclispe
|
On 16 Oct 2014, at 11:10, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 10/16/2014 11:03 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote:
1. EF decided not to collect stack traces that stem from arbitrary
external plugins for privacy reasons.
Thus I only filter for IStatus object (error messages) whose pluginId
starts with org.eclipse.*.
2. I get the information about STS b/c some users disable the
"anonymize stack trace“ option or because I track which plugins are
on the execution stack.
3. We do not generally collect error messages from 3rd party plugins.
Thanks.
I believe now that we have reached a point of the discussion when we
all agree that it seems impossible for users to make a difference
between Eclipse and 3rd-party plugin, there is probably a room to open
a bit more the thing to 3rd-party. I believe it would be good to also
collect stacks and error from 3rd-party plugins, and show them in a
different, may be private if necessary, report.
WDYT?
Speaking as board member that was present for the "call for home"
policy:
We cannot gather data for anyone besides eclipse foundation based
projects since it has privacy and legal liability issues connected to
it.
Speaking as a 3rd party vendor/contributor:
Knowing the above we can't just enable gathering of *all* data, but I
would love if we could somehow explicitly agree that our bundles gets
included in the tracing (i.e. org.jboss.*) to help improve eclipse
ecosystem overall.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
