I'm tired of debating. Another survey is probably a good way to make
all of us agreeing on something.
We need to define rules before the survey this time ;)
So we write a preamble telling that given the outcome of previous
survey, we need more fine-grained answers and reminding that
warnings can be overridden at workspace-level and project-level, we
remind them that they can see warnings in action by setting their
preferences, then we list all available JDT warnings and we ask
users whether they want each one ignore/warning. The majority wins
without further discussion and the most answered setting for each
warning becomes a default in EPP.
Does that sound good to everyone?
I have the impression that creating another survey is a good thing.
If we can continuously get 2500 votes every 2-3 weeks, let's just
keep on doing a survey whenever we feel it's necessary.
It now looks like this ide-dev mailing-list is responsible of
defining surveys targeting IDE users and change preferences
according to the outcome. That's some concrete action!
|