| Thanks Jens,
 I have reproduced the behavior and can confirm that it shouldn't
      appear. The only clue i see is the derived "namespace" reference,
      although it really shouldn't make a difference.
 
 I will give it a closer look tomorrow.
 
 Regards,
 Daniel
 
 Am 16.09.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Jens Bürger:
 
 Am 16.09.2015 um 18:41 schrieb Daniel Strüber:
      
 Based on the screenshot, I assume that
        this rule should do the job,
        unless there is an additional edge in the input model not
        considered by
 the rule. Do you mind sending a minimal example?
 
 No problem.
 
 
 
        Regards,
 Daniel
 
 
 Am 16.09.2015 um 18:35 schrieb Jens Bürger:
 
 Thanks for your quick reply,
          
 I altered the rule as shown in the screenshot but it doesn't
          help.
 
 Jens
 
 Am 16.09.2015 um 18:24 schrieb Daniel Strüber:
 
 You're totally right, the containment
            edge must be deleted (the
            graphical editor does this by default, so I usually let it
            do this piece
 of thinking for me :)).
 
 Technically, both directions should work, since both edges
            are
 EOpposites and thus EMF takes care of updating their
            correspondence. For
 the sake of clarity, I prefer modeling the containment edge,
 "transition" (as opposed to the container edge,
            "container"), since the
 containment edge is a distinguished kind of edge and
            highlighted as such
 in the editor.
 
 Regards,
 Daniel
 
 Am 16.09.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Jens Bürger:
 
 Am 16.09.2015 um 17:57 schrieb
              Daniel Strüber:
              […]
 
 To get an intact rule, you have to
                specify the container
                node and the connecting containment edge as preserved
                elements.
 
 Are you sure that the connecting containment edge needs to
              be
 specified as preserving? Isn't that exactly a dangling
              edge then?
 
 However, I tried to model it as you suggested, but if I
              try to specify
 the "transition" as preserve, the diagram editor also sets
              the
 Transition node to preserve.
 
 I'm not really sure what is the right direction for the
              containment
 edge. I tried both with the most obvious possibilities for
              edge types
 ("container" for Transition->Region and "transition"
              for
 Region->Transition) but none of this worked so far.
 
 Greetings,
 Jens
 _______________________________________________
 henshin-user mailing list
 henshin-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
              or
 unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-user
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 henshin-user mailing list
 henshin-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
          unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-user
 
 
 --
 Dipl.-Inf. Daniel Strüber
 Software Engineering Research Group
 Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany, Hans-Meerwein-Str., Room
        05D12
 Phone: +49-6421-28-21511
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 henshin-user mailing list
 henshin-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-user
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
henshin-user mailing list
henshin-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-user
 
 
 -- 
Dipl.-Inf. Daniel Strüber
Software Engineering Research Group
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany, Hans-Meerwein-Str., Room 05D12
Phone: +49-6421-28-21511
 |