User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2
yes.
On 6/14/2023 9:50 AM, Ivar Grimstad via
ee4j-pmc wrote:
I'm okay with creating the project.
The licensing of the different artifacts and repositories
can be worked out later. The original licenses should be kept,
and dual licensing should be avoided for the repositories.
Is that okay with you, Ed?
Ivar
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at
6:35 PM Tanja Obradovic via ee4j-pmc <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks both!
This email request is for creation of Eclipse
Documentation for Jakarta EE only that will host Jakarta
EE Tutorial repository with with Eclipse Public
License 2.0.
Other issues will be discussed in a separate email,
information was provided for the context only.
On 2023-06-14 12:22 p.m., Ivar Grimstad via ee4j-pmc
wrote:
Isn't it the intention to keep the licenses
as they are for the different repositories? I agree with
Ed that dual licensing would be a tad much for
examples.
The project can manage repositories that have
different licenses.
The license listed on the PMI page
is BSD Zero which removes clauses that were
required under the original contribution license,
EDL. Is the goal to dual-license all the content?
If so, what would the point be since any user
would almost certainly opt for the zero clause
option. I'd previously objected to changing the
license of material that was contributed by
Oracle. If new content were to be generated under
BSD Zero, that would be okay with us, but
monitoring this could become challenging.
-- Ed
On 6/14/2023 9:04 AM, Ivar Grimstad via
ee4j-pmc wrote:
+1
Ivar
On Wed, Jun
14, 2023 at 1:32 AM Tanja Obradovic via
ee4j-pmc <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear PMC,
as you may be aware Jakarta
EE Platform specification project
since its creation, contained Jakarta
EE Tutorial repository as well
as Jakarta EE Tutorial Examples
repository .
It has been discussed and agreed on
within Jakarta EE Plaform call,
Specification CMTE call, also at the
Marketing call, that this needs to be
changed, as the Tutorial and the Tutorial
Examples are not specifications and do not
need to follow JESP as process for its
development.
The license (EDL v1.0, BSD-3-Clause) of
this project is adequate already for the
examples so I believe no change is being
requested or needed.
There is a need for creation of the new
project that will host Jakarta EE
Tutorial repository. The proposal
for Eclipse
Documentation for Jakarta EE has
been created to do so with Eclipse Public
License 2.0.