Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] [External] : Re: Approval for creation of Eclipse Documentation for Jakarta EE is needed
  • From: Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:17:10 -0700
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; 1; spf=pass; dmarc=pass action=none; dkim=pass; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=4KinihPeVFYDJYyywe5cRHzwMn4LZeOojxbTCIg4Bwo=; b=VVhQZYb72RWJwGbIKpkAdSH/6lAYvkCK706Z1TZY+jMgT5vkcpE5W/zLTH5AEPy+jc/whrZhjsVKeJzjxjQ3+KcDq+wslYWdnhDigo7FoFJ4hOS+CSc6r/2gMw/at1ny2UNGlS8EMsNIYrI4MDWLmwlHmxDBcJ17Ew1xs+l5RJY/KH2HiC2eIAZoYqveABcIY6Xo4buYB9fCxFeasbfF3rL3MDM8YToz1EtfyM77wWPzSpLFSBYri1YG0B5oIdUmJtkSRiqxevo0FgGeEMszTDU9tNYCu7qsSvxzMimZSeeLlxbvbQRCa9uMiyvAWBO9t5pDv7Pk74lV/UnJmLUjJA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901;; cv=none; b=fIFCRVWJP/6ENx4OzEQVF6CiiGcQJldBMkE3GKy+cUjXRjaiUXr/MLL2ucWNQpkucJ3U5QVypRQbKrVlNgDGnhxyh+lyquyACVlqc3LzMS8SqbQiiDG/kXVPSwgb9KQ856VYKMQd4fnFK/ApcQy9KSNHsfm10p7WNDshmxM2aNAJ0oYxKmIJSr7uGjATdmLfsDMmBizOvzcSRaOH7FbQzaUOlHZF/vHL+yhtziBMJq+NrVZeAC19jDc8mfdh3x/KYb/FXtr+UBkaYTnyYxfV7qOOKUEfVhDV8tUFx489uTbDsZmtMMLIqG44nPPQoIRMpkJxgkRj8jPwXCxy4xu7Cw==
  • Delivered-to: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-archive: <>
  • List-help: <>
  • List-subscribe: <>, <>
  • List-unsubscribe: <>, <>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2

The license listed on the PMI page is BSD Zero which removes clauses that were required under the original contribution license, EDL. Is the goal to dual-license all the content? If so, what would the point be since any user would almost certainly opt for the zero clause option. I'd previously objected to changing the license of material that was contributed by Oracle. If new content were to be generated under BSD Zero, that would be okay with us, but monitoring this could become challenging.

-- Ed

On 6/14/2023 9:04 AM, Ivar Grimstad via ee4j-pmc wrote:


On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 1:32 AM Tanja Obradovic via ee4j-pmc <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear PMC,

as you may be aware Jakarta EE Platform specification project since its creation, contained Jakarta EE Tutorial repository as well as Jakarta EE Tutorial Examples repository .

It has been discussed and agreed on within Jakarta EE Plaform call, Specification CMTE call, also at the Marketing call, that this needs to be changed, as the Tutorial and the Tutorial Examples are not specifications and do not need to follow JESP as process for its development.

As Eclipse Examples for Jakarta EE is an existing project all we needed to do is to move the Jakarta EE Tutorial Examples repository to this project. This part has been done, please see

The license (EDL v1.0, BSD-3-Clause) of this project is adequate already for the examples so I believe  no change is being requested or needed. 

There is a need for creation of the new project that will host Jakarta EE Tutorial repository. The proposal for Eclipse Documentation for Jakarta EE has been created to do so with Eclipse Public License 2.0.

My ask for PMC is to approve creation of Eclipse Documentation for Jakarta EE so we can finalize the project creation.




Tanja Obradovic

Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation


Eclipse Foundation: The Community for Open Innovation and Collaboration

ee4j-pmc mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

ee4j-pmc mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PB9r3r1DuaP6wP05iGi2oMTt-rcKwOhkNXTaBls8KiG4gBLTpRH_ukPtM3LFsQvhYaK2PQndhARb28fjig$ 

Back to the top