On 11/10/2015 06:32 PM, Tyler Jewell
wrote:
The issue about
GitHub Issues is not one of technology, but rather one of
culture & behavior.
That can be discussed.
To me the culture and behavior at GitHub is the one of open-source,
Git and GitHub tools on top of it. I's not much more than what
SourceForge, Google Code, CodeHaus were some years ago. A free
Forge-as-a-Service for OSS projects. When one day, the trends change
and a GitHub competitor takes over, then the culture & behavior
will remain and evolve by adopting the new tools.
Anyway, testimonials such as the one from Jetty claiming that they
have more community investment in GitHub rather than Bugzilla+Gerrit
are very convincing about the need to be there for some projects.
But on the other hand, it also reveals that the Eclipse contribution
process is complicated. My idea on that is that a project GitHub
page is considered by many projects and contributors as the welcome
page, and directly shows code and all means to contribute, whereas
most Eclipse projects show instead a description page, then a link
on How to Contribute and then users can access the various tools.
The code-centric approach of GitHub seems to be more efficient.
|