Le 10/11/2015 16:15, Mike Milinkovich a
écrit :
> On 10/11/2015 9:35 AM, Alexandre
Montplaisir wrote:
>> Migrating to GitHub means becoming
dependant on a proprietary
>> platform. This was not the case in
the CVS -> Git migration.
> This is true. And that is why we have
added a requirement for "freedom
> of action" for all infrastructure. If
GitHub was to go away tomorrow, we
> will need to be able for all affected
Eclipse projects to be able to
> continue unabated.
>
>> There is imo no question that the
user experience on GitHub is miles
>> better than on Bugzilla. However I
think we have to be very careful
>> before deciding to become entirely
dependant on a third-party.
> Agree 100%. Much careful thinking went
into this.
>
>> I would much prefer if we could
have an open-source ALM management
>> platform hosted at Eclipse.
> So would we all. But since an
industrial-grade ALM management project
> has not yet appeared, we have to deal
with the facts as they are.
This solution exist, this is gitlab. This is
open source and could be
hosted by the eclipse foundation.
Gitlab seems to resolve all the issues
raised here. I think this
solution should be really considered.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-project-leadership mailing list
eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is
generated by processes internal to the
Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently
removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.