Le 10/11/2015 16:15, Mike
Milinkovich a écrit :
> On 10/11/2015 9:35 AM,
Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
>> Migrating to GitHub
means becoming dependant on a
proprietary
>> platform. This was
not the case in the CVS ->
Git migration.
> This is true. And that is
why we have added a
requirement for "freedom
> of action" for all
infrastructure. If GitHub was
to go away tomorrow, we
> will need to be able for
all affected Eclipse projects
to be able to
> continue unabated.
>
>> There is imo no
question that the user
experience on GitHub is miles
>> better than on
Bugzilla. However I think we
have to be very careful
>> before deciding to
become entirely dependant on a
third-party.
> Agree 100%. Much careful
thinking went into this.
>
>> I would much prefer
if we could have an
open-source ALM management
>> platform hosted at
Eclipse.
> So would we all. But
since an industrial-grade ALM
management project
> has not yet appeared, we
have to deal with the facts as
they are.
This solution exist, this is
gitlab. This is open source
and could be
hosted by the eclipse
foundation.
Gitlab seems to resolve all
the issues raised here. I
think this
solution should be really
considered.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-project-leadership
mailing list
eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
IMPORTANT: Membership in this
list is generated by processes
internal to the Eclipse
Foundation. To be permanently
removed from this list, you
must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.