|Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Simultaneous Release Brainstorming|
Hi, +1 for cadence, schedule and name. Can someone remind me what the purpose of the second checkpoint (C2) is? Why is it not a milestone instead? I'm a bit concerned about the "quiet week" becoming just "quiet 3 days". It usually takes already 1-2 days to even fix a bug/discuss if a re-spin should happen. In this scenario re-spins will need to be an absolute exception - which they should be anyways. So if the bug does not literally set the machine on fire, user will need to wait for 13 weeks! ;) Regards, Fred -- Frederic Gurr Release Engineer Eclipse Foundation On 06.03.2018 17:22, Mélanie Bats wrote: > Hi, > > Le 01/03/2018 à 17:59, Mélanie Bats a écrit : >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IVA59E5bxv1l1W1ZTSZMUUH7IKIO-mRLEGn1bVO-dFs/edit?usp=sharing >> I need all of you to comment it, then when we will agree on the >> content I will publish it on the wiki. >> >> You will see that in the FAQ I consider that we are decided about: >> * the cadence : it will be 13 weeks >> * the schedule : it will start on June 25th 2018 >> * the name : it will be Eclipse Year.Month >> >> Could you all votes for these three points by answering to this mail? > At the moment, I had 4 +1 votes from Aleksandar, Nick, Dani and Martin. > > As it is an important decision I would like to see more votes. I expect > a vote from mostly all of the members of the planning council. Please > answer to this thread: do you agree with the proposed cadence, schedule, > name and the FAQ? > > Thanks all for your participation!
Back to the top