Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Reminder and actions for 3/4Planning

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

So, you'd think a should-do should appear the same whether done or not? Why list them at all then?
I like the different color ... but if someone wants to program a light-pink vs. dark-ping that would be fine.
There is a small negative association to not doing the "should do" items ... just not negative enough
to get you kicked off the train. :)



Oisin Hurley ---03/04/2009 11:05:34 AM---> One important item to discuss is the status of various projects. > There is a lot of yellow in the

From:	Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxx>
To:	"eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	03/04/2009 11:05 AM
Subject:	Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Reminder and actions for 3/4Planning Council meeting
Sent by:	eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

> One important item to discuss is the status of various projects.
> There is a lot of yellow in the M4/M5 sections of
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php
>

Nice matrix. I notice that if you RESOLVE WONTFIX a SHOULD-DO
then you get a pink cell. I get the impression that there is
some kind of negative association here. If so, then I'll change
those SHOULD-DOs to RESOLVE FIXED, but I wouldn't have thought
that WONTFIXing a non-mandatory item would be called out as
special.

  --oh
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.