Well, times are changing. I recently saw an institution where the ethics committee was being hijacked and that definitely concerned me.
On 2019-02-23 1:14 p.m., Matthew Khouzam wrote:
If it were a different foundation, I would be cautious, but eclipse has always in my esteem acted in good faith. That being said, I am all for a re-wording or clarification. If this scares someone enough to email about it, it probably scares 10 people we haven't heard of.
Matthew (and Peter)
Those words have been in our committer agreements since 2004. In that time we have had a few thousand committers and several hundred member companies sign up to those terms. This is the first time we have ever had a question about it. I think that speaks for itself.
I am asked to sign a new committers agreement like I guess all of us.
I read the agreement and it contains this section that worries me:
This is basically an open ended agreement, to be amended by the foundation anytime. Are there more committers worried about such an agreement or am I overly cautious?
eclipse.org-committers mailing list
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
_______________________________________________eclipse.org-committers mailing listeclipse.org-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-committersIMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxxto request removal.
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com