Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-community] FW: [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Creation of the Jakarta EEWorking Group

+100

Coming at you from my phone, please excuse typos, poor grammar, curtness, and dashing good looks

On Mar 10, 2018 12:21 AM, "Markus KARG" <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It might be a big deal, but honestly I think it is time to change this.

 

When the EF was founded it was a club of enterprises. As of today, there are many individuals and JUGs providing valueable input to many projects. It simply is fair to let these people have a say in all decisions, too. I do not like the idea that votes are related to Dollars. Votes must be realted to merits.

 

-Markus

 

From: ee4j-community-bounces@eclipse.org [mailto:ee4j-community-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich
Sent: Freitag, 9. März 2018 23:29
To: EE4J community discussions
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] FW: [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Creation of the Jakarta EEWorking Group

 

 

The short answer is I don’t know. I would have to ask for a legal interpretation. At the moment I am concerned that we could not do this without changing our Bylaws and Membership Agreement, which would be a Really Big Deal. 

 

Mike Milinkovich

Please note new email address. 


On Mar 9, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mike/all,

 

Thanks for the update. Glad the Guest membership allows e.g. JUGs to participate, although they have no say unlike the Partner Members in the JCP at least in the Executive Committee.

Since they are called Associate Members they have approximately the same rights (vote for the Board etc. I assume, but not as formal members of a JSR EG in the JCP either. Other organizations like the OGC (also a Solutions member of Eclipse Foundation) have their own Associate membership category: http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/join/levels#Associate

And it sounds not so different regarding criteria for joining, but unlike Jakarta EE WG or other Eclipse Working Groups the OGC does grant Associate Members voting rights in its Technical Working Groups and standardization efforts.

 

Werner

 

 

From: Mike Milinkovich
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 20:57
To: eclipse.org-membership-at-large@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jakarta.ee-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Creation of the Jakarta EEWorking Group

 

All,

I am pleased to announce that the review period for the Jakarta EE Working Group (formerly the EE.next Working Group) and its charter has successfully completed. This working group is now officially created. Any future revisions to the charter can be approved by the Steering Committee and the Executive Director.

Please subscribe to jakarta.ee-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx if you wish to follow along. For Solutions Members and above of the Eclipse Foundation who would like to formally join the working group, all that is required is an email to that list stating that you want to join, and at what level.

Best regards,

--
Mike Milinkovich

 

 

_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community


_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community



Back to the top