|
Hi Jakob,
Thanks for this. Is there any sort of workaround command? Perhaps a way of cancelling the manouver?
Kind regards,
Jordan
From: sumo-user <sumo-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 22 February 2023 08:06
To: Sumo project User discussions <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Lane hopping and emergency braking at zipper
Thank you for the example. I now understand the situation you are referring to.
The behavior occurs because the lateral movement during lane changing is independent of the apparent "lateral" movement that occurs on the zipper merge. Once the vehicle comes out of the zipper merge it finds itself in the middle of the started lanechange
maneuver and simply completes it.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Hi Jakob,
I have attachd the appropriate files for lane hopping and removed therandom seed so the default seed is being used. I will work on reproducing the failed collision detection but this is more time consuming.
Kind regards,
Jordan
Thanks for the examples, unfortunately, I cannot run them because they make use of sumo option --random. (The traci commands no longer match the required simulation state, i.e. vehicle ids are not present at the assumed time).
If you want to have randomness in a reproducible way you need to use option --seed SEED with different values of SEED. Then you can send me the seed that shows the relevant behavior.
regards,
Jakob
Hi again!
I have managed to reproduce the collision detection failing and haev attached the files to recreate it. The image below shows the GUI message for the collision traci didn't detect.
Kind regards,
Jordan
Hi Jakob,
I have produced a simlified example which reproduces the lane hopping. In this example there is a continuous lane change with no sublane model but as far as I can tell this problem presents in the sublane model, basic continuous lane changes and instantaneous
changes. This problem arises with both the laneChange and laneChangeRelative commands.
The log file for collisions not being detected is more difficult as this is a lot more random but I will try and generate an example for it.
Kind regards,
Jordan
Without a traceFile I cannot replicate the problem. Simply provide a trace that is long enough to cover the problematic situation (it will contain all traci calls that were sent from your code and thus also replicate your randomness on my end).
Hi Jakob,
Upon review the vehicles are not stopping but are failing to finish their continuous change due to the lane ending. This while not ideal, isn't as bad as what I said earlier.
My major problem now is lane skipping around the merging zone. The vehilcle is only allowed to switch lanes on the "merge" edge which has 3 lanes. However, it seems to be hopping over two lanes when a lane change is commanded at the zipper (or perhaps
right before it?). I have already tried to limit this by including a position condition. It should not be able to change lanes at the junction.
On this same project I also have an issue with TraCI not detecting collisions which the simulator is.
I fear a trace file may not show case the problem as I am using a reinforcement learning model to respond dynamically to the environment which contains randomness. I have however, included the scenario. The command being used is a simple traci.vehicle.changeLane(id,
1, 10).
Kind regards,
Jordan
Technically, there should never be a lane-end warning if the zipper connections are set up correctly. It's hard to tell what's going on without observng running traci code.
Hello,
I am using a zipper lane driven by TraCI controlled vehicles. This zipper lane reduces three lanes to two. The lane changes are continuous. The TraCI vehicles can merge at any point on the zipper lane or simply follow the lane and merge as it ends. Once the
vehicles have merged, control of them is returned to SUMO.
I find when vehicles choose to change lanes late on the zipper lane, they have two problems.
- Occasionally, they will emergency brake. I receive an error message about the lane ending. I assume this is in reference to either the to or from lane ending as the moving vehicle moves onto the zipper junction during the lane change.
- They occaisonally cross two lanes instead of the intended one and thus end up on the left lane on the reduced side instead of the right.
How might I configure my setup to avoid these issues?
Thanks,
Jordan
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
|
