Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation

From: Roger Light <roger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:47:37 +0000
Delivered-to: paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/paho-dev>
List-help: <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev>, <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/paho-dev>, <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Carrer, Marco
<marco.carrer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another alternative could be to make it explicit:
>
> mqtt+ssl://host:port/

+ isn't allowed in hostnames, so this wouldn't work with SRV DNS
records or zeroconf.

Cheers,

Roger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Marc L Cohen

References:
- [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Michael Klishin
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Andy Piper
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Paul Fremantle
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Dave Locke
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Michael Klishin
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Paul Fremantle
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Andy Piper
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Roger Light
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Carrer, Marco

Prev by Date: Re: [paho-dev] MQTT Interop Testing Day
Next by Date: [paho-dev] Paho downloads
Previous by thread: Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
Next by thread: Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs