Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation

Another alternative could be to make it explicit:



On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Roger Light <roger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Andy Piper <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Still a bit concerned about the "MQTT-S" vs mqtts:// thing but if it is well
>> documented (and -S becomes -SN) then we can make that work too.
> I agree, it's prone to being confusing forever.
> How about smqtt?
> Cheers,
> Roger
> _______________________________________________
> paho-dev mailing list
> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top