It looks ok to me. I certainly wouldn't want to preclude
behaviour though, bridging comes under that at the moment as do
least three other features in mosquitto ;)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ian Craggs
> I've responded to all the comments on the proposal draft.
> everyone feel about it now?
> I added this statement in the scope section:
> Mosquitto adheres to the standards as closely as possible,
so it may be used
> as a reference server.
> I'm not sure about the second clause of that sentence,
whether it's a good
> idea or not. I thought about adding "in its default
configuration", to allow
> for non-standard behaviour to be optional. I'm not sure
whether stating the
> aim to be a reference server would open us up to any legal
> paho-dev mailing list
paho-dev mailing list