Ian, Roger,
If you think the proposal is ready to go, please work with emo@xxxxxxxxxxx (e.g Wayne) to get it posted.
Thanks! It's exciting to have finally gotten to this point.
Mike Milinkovich mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx +1.613.220.3223
Hi Ian,
It looks ok to me. I certainly wouldn't want to preclude non-standard behaviour though, bridging comes under that at the moment as do at least three other features in mosquitto ;)
Cheers,
Roger
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ian Craggs <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've responded to all the comments on the proposal draft. How does > everyone feel about it now? > > I added this statement in the scope section: > > Mosquitto adheres to the standards as closely as possible, so it may be used > as a reference server. > > I'm not sure about the second clause of that sentence, whether it's a good > idea or not. I thought about adding "in its default configuration", to allow > for non-standard behaviour to be optional. I'm not sure whether stating the > aim to be a reference server would open us up to any legal trickiness. > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > paho-dev mailing list > paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev > _______________________________________________ paho-dev mailing list paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
|