Ah, I somehow managed to miss that. Thanks.
Mike Milinkovich mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx +1.613.220.3223
Hi Mike,
This is what I wrote a while back: http://test.mosquitto.org/proposal/proposal.html It still needs some work.
Cheers,
Roger
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Roger, Ian, > > I suggest that you create a draft proposal for the Eclipse Mosquitto > project, and just leave blank the section on where this will fit within the > Eclipse project "org chart". Whether it is a sub-project of Paho or a peer > of it is something we only need to finalize by the Creation Review. It > doesn't even need to be nailed down completely to post the project. > > Of course, if anyone actually feels really strongly about this > organizational stuff, please speak up. I can say in all honesty that it > makes very little difference once the project is actually up and running. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Roger Light >> Sent: June-24-13 12:31 PM >> To: General development discussions for paho project >> Subject: Re: [paho-dev] Contribution of MQTT Servers (Mosquitto and RSMB) >> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Mike Milinkovich >> <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 24/06/2013 9:07 AM, Ian Craggs wrote: >> > >> > I thought that Roger had indicated that some other location had been >> > discussed for Mosquitto >> > >> > >> > Roger - Can you remind me what was discussed? Another alternative is >> > to make Mosquitto a peer to Paho, under the still-being-discussed M2M >> > top level project. To be honest, there is almost no difference between >> > those two options from the perspective of the Eclipse Development > Process. >> >> It was basically along the lines of inside or outside of Paho, and if in > Paho then >> how it would appear (separate component, sub project - is there any > difference >> between these or just different names for the same thing?) as you said. >> >> > Top-level projects are intended to group communities of interest, and >> > there is no need to be pedantic about their scope. >> >> I had kind of assumed this, but it's nice to have it confirmed. >> >> > I am assuming that you have no desire to take Mosquitto to the >> > EclipseRT. If my assumption is incorrect, please chime in! >> >> I had wondered before if it should be part of the RT project, but that was > based >> on a flawed understanding of its scope. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Roger >> _______________________________________________ >> paho-dev mailing list >> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > paho-dev mailing list > paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev _______________________________________________ paho-dev mailing list paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
|