Re: [paho-dev] Contribution of MQTT Servers (Mosquitto and RSMB)

[Roger Light <roger@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mike,

This is what I wrote a while back:
http://test.mosquitto.org/proposal/proposal.html It still needs some
work.

Cheers,

Roger



On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Mike Milinkovich
<mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roger, Ian,
>
> I suggest that you create a draft proposal for the Eclipse Mosquitto
> project, and just leave blank the section on where this will fit within the
> Eclipse project "org chart". Whether it is a sub-project of Paho or a peer
> of it is something we only need to finalize by the Creation Review. It
> doesn't even need to be nailed down completely to post the project.
>
> Of course, if anyone actually feels really strongly about this
> organizational stuff, please speak up. I can say in all honesty that it
> makes very little difference once the project is actually up and running.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Roger Light
>> Sent: June-24-13 12:31 PM
>> To: General development discussions for paho project
>> Subject: Re: [paho-dev] Contribution of MQTT Servers (Mosquitto and RSMB)
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Mike Milinkovich
>> <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 24/06/2013 9:07 AM, Ian Craggs wrote:
>> >
>> > I thought that Roger had indicated that some other location had been
>> > discussed for Mosquitto
>> >
>> >
>> > Roger - Can you remind me what was discussed? Another alternative is
>> > to make Mosquitto a peer to Paho, under the still-being-discussed M2M
>> > top level project. To be honest, there is almost no difference between
>> > those two options from the perspective of the Eclipse Development
> Process.
>>
>> It was basically along the lines of inside or outside of Paho, and if in
> Paho then
>> how it would appear (separate component, sub project - is there any
> difference
>> between these or just different names for the same thing?) as you said.
>>
>> > Top-level projects are intended to group communities of interest, and
>> > there is no need to be pedantic about their scope.
>>
>> I had kind of assumed this, but it's nice to have it confirmed.
>>
>> > I am assuming that you have no desire to take Mosquitto to the
>> > EclipseRT. If my assumption is incorrect, please chime in!
>>
>> I had wondered before if it should be part of the RT project, but that was
> based
>> on a flawed understanding of its scope.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Roger
>> _______________________________________________
>> paho-dev mailing list
>> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> paho-dev mailing list
> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev