|Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] RC3|
Hi Ed,Unless good APIs documentation is a strong requirement, I don't think that extra efforts can convince somebody.
I'll take into consideration for my new code, in which I want to have accurate documentation. Then I could do some proper judge.
Having RC2 issues reporting users means that somebody else is strongly interested in having a good quality improved Kepler OCL release ;).
Cheers, Adolfo. On 03/06/2013 19:39, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi I went to the EclipseCon 2012 presentation and failed to see how Intent was actually useful. I leave it to you to convince me. Fortunately both RC2 regressions are the same one. Two RC2 users! The fix is just an NPE guard. Testing now. Regards Ed On 03/06/2013 19:32, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:Hi Ed, Eclipse OCL Core (+1) RC3 done. Integration build with the whole Eclipse Core + Tools also done for the aggregator build. Concerning documentation, I had in my TO DO list giving a look to the Intent project . After a very, very quick look, it sounds cool although it also seems to require much effort to keep everything in sync (quite challenging for a big project like OCL).  http://www.eclipse.org/intent/ Cheers, Adolfo. On 03/06/2013 18:14, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:Ok, So I'll follow the normal (+1, +3 timing) procedures. Cheers, Adolfo._______________________________________________ mdt-ocl.dev mailing list mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6379 - Release Date: 06/03/13_______________________________________________ mdt-ocl.dev mailing list mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
Back to the top