Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: AW: [mdt-bpmn2.dev] Build fix

Hi Antoine,

ah, I see. It somehow worked as it couldn't find any artifact but also
didn't require any. But when I try to download something, I get

RuntimeError : Unable to download <artifactspec>. No remote repositories
defined.

If I remove one |, it lists the tried repositories.

Cheers,
  Tammo

On 06.08.2010 19:54, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Tammo, the ||= is not a typo.
> 
> As of now, the build on build.eclipse.org <http://build.eclipse.org> is
> meant to check that the compilation works fine, and we are starting to
> have tests too.
> 
> I set up an other build for Intalio on intalio.org <http://intalio.org>,
> which uploads here:
> http://www.intalio.org/public/maven2/org/eclipse/org.eclipse.bpmn2.feature/
> 
> <http://www.intalio.org/public/maven2/org/eclipse/org.eclipse.bpmn2.feature/>The
> ||= lets me set an other remote repository for this build. Pretty
> convenient for me, let me know if it doesn't work well for you.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 18:15, Tammo van Lessen <tvanlessen@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tvanlessen@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Reiner,
> 
>     I think the ||= was a typo. It didn't break the build but emptied the
>     list of repositories. I think it however intended to add them to a
>     potentially existing list, via |= (union).
> 
>     The other thing might be either a windows or a config issue. I read
>     somewhere that FileUtils.makedirs is better than File.makedirs as this
>     woudl depend on ftools and the use of ftools is not recommended.
>     Whatever... my patch is of course just a proposal and I'm sure Antoine
>     knows better about ruby magic than I do. I for me was happy that I could
>     build it after applying these fixes on my machine and thus I wanted to
>     share it with you guys :)
> 
>     And somehow it looks like that I'm experiencing the strangest buildr
>     problems the buildr team could ever imagine ;)
> 
>     Best,
>      Tammo
> 
>     On 06.08.2010 17:58, Hille-Doering, Reiner wrote:
>     > Hi Tammo,
>     > I'm happy that you like the stuff.
>     > About the build: I'm sure that Antoine could incorporate your
>     proposal. However, we already have working build on this Hudson:
>     > https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/buildr-bpmn2-0.7-nightly/ws/
>     > If the build script is wrong, why does it successfully build?
>     >
>     > Thanks and regards,
>     >  Reiner.
>     >
>     >
>     > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     > Von: mdt-bpmn2.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:mdt-bpmn2.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     [mailto:mdt-bpmn2.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:mdt-bpmn2.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>] Im Auftrag von Tammo van
>     Lessen
>     > Gesendet: Freitag, 6. August 2010 17:04
>     > An: mdt-bpmn2.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mdt-bpmn2.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     > Betreff: [mdt-bpmn2.dev] Build fix
>     >
>     > Hi guys,
>     >
>     > first off, thanks for the great model. I assume it will still need
>     > some love but I'm happy to have a comprehensive model.
>     >
>     > I tried to build the stuff but experience some troubles with the build
>     > file. Please find attached a patch that fixes some JRuby issues
>     > (File.makedirs -> FileUtils.makedirs).
>     >
>     > Are the any plans to push this to a m2 repository?
>     >
>     > I hope I don't need to sign a CLA or to file a bug or something.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >   Tammo
>     >
> 
>     --
>     Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de
>     _______________________________________________
>     mdt-bpmn2.dev mailing list
>     mdt-bpmn2.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mdt-bpmn2.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-bpmn2.dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-bpmn2.dev mailing list
> mdt-bpmn2.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-bpmn2.dev

-- 
Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de


Back to the top