Realized this window was open since last week. Quick response to this question and then I'll do the other ones.
Hi All,
I'm one of the Jakarta Transaction mentors for the Jakarta EE 9 release and wanted to ask the open-ended question on if there are any questions/issues/blockers I can move forward for you? There's a specification committee call tomorrow at 9am pacific, so I would have the opportunity to consult with everyone and come back with answers quickly.
Here's the status I can see going through the various emails and PRs.
- Slow PR reviews has been an issue and should be noted to the
Specification Committee even if there's no immediate remedy.
From my own point of view, it seems the project can deal with the time it takes to get a review. We could identify a routine to use to achieve specific dates though. Is that in the projects control or something we need the committee to approve?
Sure, I think there's a great deal of flexibility in how the project manages itself. Definitely areas around recruiting new committers, deciding processes for proposing features, merging PRs, and generally getting day-to-day work done is all under the purview of the project itself.
As long as it adds up to a spec & tck that can pass a specification committee vote, almost anything that happens up to that point is up to the project.
-David
|
