Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jta-dev] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 for Jakarta EE 9 remaining items
I don't see the schooner on:
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/activation/2.0/jakarta-activation-spec-2.0.html
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/annotations/2.0/annotations-spec-2.0-RC1.html
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/authentication/2.0/authentication-spec-2.0-SNAPSHOT.html
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/authorization/2.0/authorization-spec-2.0.html
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/batch/2.0/jakarta-batch-spec-2.0.html
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/bean-validation/3.0/jakarta-bean-validation-spec-3.0.html
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/concurrency/2.0/concurrency-spec-2.0-RC2.html
I would not propose to try to add it at this time.

That means we should be OK to move ahead and try to commence some release activities. I will try to build and release an 2.0.0.RC3. Then we can try to move on with the GA.

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 12:17, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Jonathan!

Once we see https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/167 pass then I will merge that and we can move towards releasing hopefully (unless someone things we need to address the schooner in the HTML version of the spec).

Thanks again!
Tom

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 11:46, Jonathan Gallimore <jgallimore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there anything else we need to do? If there's other stuff on the list, or if you need some help, please let us know!

Jon

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 5:44 PM Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The current action that we need to complete as a project is for a committer to review: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/161 so that it can be merged. After that I can raise a PR for https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/165 and then we will hopefully have the main changes made for Jakarta Transactions 2.0.0.

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 17:12, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think for Jakarta Transactions we will make no further changes to JTS reference so I closed #105 already.

In terms of where we are now, hopefully we can get the spec merged into master and then proceed on but I am still wondering about https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/159 so I intend to create a different thread about that if I can't work out whether we need to do something further there.

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 17:26, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 16:12, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I will not be available next week and so will not be able to work on the below during that time.

What I think we still need to do:
1. Resolve (at least) these issues: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AEE9
2. Release a release candidate (RC3) to check that things are still OK (in my opinion)
3. Release the GA
(During these steps keeping this issue up-to-date: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/75)

I think the main unknowns from item "1." is to resolve https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/105 with respect to understanding the JTS reference. Please also see the discussion on that issue and also see the question it depends upon: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/238 - if someone can help move that on next week it would be great.

Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
jta-dev mailing list
jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev


--
Jonathan Gallimore
_______________________________________________
jta-dev mailing list
jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev

Back to the top