Re: [jta-dev] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 for Jakarta EE 9 remaining items

[Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think for Jakarta Transactions we will make no further changes to JTS reference so I closed #105 already.

In terms of where we are now, hopefully we can get the spec merged into master and then proceed on but I am still wondering about https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/159 so I intend to create a different thread about that if I can't work out whether we need to do something further there.

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 17:26, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Does anyone have a suggestion on how to deal with: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/105 / https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/238

Thanks,

Tom

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 16:12, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I will not be available next week and so will not be able to work on the below during that time.

What I think we still need to do:

1. Resolve (at least) these issues: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AEE9
2. Release a release candidate (RC3) to check that things are still OK (in my opinion)

3. Release the GA

4. Submit the ballot: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/158

(During these steps keeping this issue up-to-date: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/75)

I think the main unknowns from item "1." is to resolve https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/105 with respect to understanding the JTS reference. Please also see the discussion on that issue and also see the question it depends upon: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/238 - if someone can help move that on next week it would be great.

Thanks,
Tom