Re: [jetty-dev] Fixing our TERRIBLE eclipse oriented build

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well to that specific jsp thing...they actually _are_ the same
classes, just broken up a bit differently for osgi purposes.

We maintain both sides of those jars, we pull and patch the glassfish
sources and build the artifacts at codehaus, then slice them up and
get them put into orbit and then depend on those

as much as possible we have tried to make sure that the only
difference between whats on the maven dependencies and whats coming
from eclipse is just the jar file with the updated manifest for osgi
purposes and that its packed and signed..

regardless, I am going to check into aether when I can and see if we
could build a eclipse-dependencies-plugin in the short term to
mitigate these build issues, otherwise I'll just grab them and put
them up on our download site for pulling I think...

thanks for the contribution though :)

cheers,
jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx



On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 01:29, mabrek <mabrek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, I see the problem.
> There is another problem: classpath of jetty distribution is different from classpath of maven jetty:run. JSP application developed with jetty:run maven plugin might break if it was deployed to jetty distribution because of different jsp compiler version.
>
> On 08/07/2010 01:13 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>> So its clear, for the portions of jetty that distribute from eclipse
>> we MUST contain only bits that have downloaded from an eclipse.org
>> site so while we build off of maven central the distributions we
>> create have to pull down jar files from eclipse.org sites and those
>> jar's have to be signed by the eclipse foundation private key...
>>
>> the two modules in question that interact with the eclipse and orbit
>> p2 repos are the fragile parts of the build
>>
>> cheers,
>> jesse
>>
>> --
>> jesse mcconnell
>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 16:10, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> we can not create a distribution based on the contents of maven
>>> central, we have to pull eclipse signed and packed artifacts from
>>> orbit...
>>>
>>> and we can't hack together a maven repo with these contents in our
>>> download section on eclipse.org because then we would need
>>> <repository> tag in our pom.xml and we are not allowed to push those
>>> back into maven central since it is bad form...
>>>
>>> the problem is that for jetty-distribution and the test-jetty-osgi
>>> builds we need to pull artifacts from orbit and from eclipse p2 repos
>>> and these repo's are not durable, they change due to eclipse retention
>>> policy
>>>
>>> jesse
>>>
>>> --
>>> jesse mcconnell
>>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 16:06, mabrek <mabrek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 08/06/2010 07:25 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>>>> we still need to use this ant goop to build since we can't release
>>>>> with external maven repositories but this way we will at least have
>>>>> reproducible builds for longer then a week based on a tag
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean by "we can't release with external maven repositories"?
>>>> I successfully tried to build 7.1.6 tag using maven repositories only, see attached patch. It needs more work to cleanup osgi submodule from manual downloading, because I simply commented it out in root pom.xml.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Anton Lebedevich
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jetty-dev mailing list
>>>> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-dev mailing list
>> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-dev mailing list
> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>