Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [External] : Re: Supporting Jakarta EE 8 and 9

If you are using the Transformer, why do you need both? I thought that the Transformer allowed your implementation to use one, or the other API. The Transformer would be responsible for converting the user code to whatever the implementation is based on.

If that were the case, the implementation only needs to be compatible with a single Jakarta EE version.

How is this flawed?

-- Ed

On 2/12/2021 5:55 AM, Scott Marlow wrote:


On 2/11/21 12:50 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
I would venture to say that this is an implementation detail...  Maybe you ship both sets of APIs, but use the one that is required depending on the context of the environment?

+1


---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)




From:        "Steve Millidge (Payara)" <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        02/11/2021 10:55
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] [jakartaee-tck-dev] Supporting Jakarta EE 8 and 9
Sent by:        "jakartaee-tck-dev" <jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>




I have, what may be a dumb question. If an implementation wanted...                                                                                                                                                                                      
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

 

I have, what may be a dumb question. If an implementation wanted to support both Jakarta EE 8 and Jakarta EE 9 using the same binary and making use of the Eclipse Transformer how would signature tests be handled given that it wouldn’t ship the apis  for one of the Jakarta EE versions?

 

Thanks

 

Steve

 

 _______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev



_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!MIEJbz_WtgHyi0ntanZCRn42g18w8Bx5SX9TWlv05JaaEQfmLoIgUDMM12t0l2U$ 

Back to the top