Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Supporting Jakarta EE 8 and 9

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I would venture to
say that this is an implementation detail...  Maybe you ship both
sets of APIs, but use the one that is required depending on the context
of the environment?

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       "Steve
Millidge (Payara)" <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       jakartaee-tck
developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       02/11/2021
10:55
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
[jakartaee-tck-dev] Supporting Jakarta EE 8 and 9
Sent
by:        "jakartaee-tck-dev"
<jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

I have, what may be a dumb
question. If an implementation wanted...

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

 

I have, what may be a dumb question. If an implementation wanted to support both Jakarta EE 8 and Jakarta EE 9 using the same binary and making use of the Eclipse Transformer how would signature tests be handled given that it wouldn’t ship the apis  for one of the Jakarta EE versions?

 

Thanks

 

Steve

 

 _______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev