| Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Supporting Jakarta EE 8 and 9 |
I would venture to say that this is an implementation detail... Maybe you ship both sets of APIs, but use the one that is required depending on the context of the environment?
+1
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)
From: "Steve Millidge (Payara)" <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02/11/2021 10:55
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [jakartaee-tck-dev] Supporting Jakarta EE 8 and 9
Sent by: "jakartaee-tck-dev" <jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I have, what may be a dumb question. If an implementation wanted...
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization.
I have, what may be a dumb question. If an implementation wanted to support both Jakarta EE 8 and Jakarta EE 9 using the same binary and making use of the Eclipse Transformer how would signature tests be handled given that it wouldn’t ship the apis for one of the Jakarta EE versions?
Thanks
Steve
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
_______________________________________________ jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev