Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Moving MicroProfile JWT to Jakarta Security?

On 2022-11-14 11:22 a.m., John Clingan wrote:

As you point out, there are important non-technical differences between the two. Any one of those could be a good reason why Jakarta EE may wish to have its own specifications which overlap or compete with MicroProfile specs.  In other words, there can be a myriad of reasons why competing specs may occur: business, technical, community, vendor support, etc etc. But "MicroProfile did it first" does not provide it with any sort of veto.

Not sure where “veto” came from. I never mentioned or implied it.  I do feel the need to say that, as a MicroProfile WG member,  the tone of the comment doesn’t feel neutral.


Apologies if my tone was off. It certainly was not intended to be anything other than neutral.

I was reacting to the comment below where you say "...I am against moving *any* specifications out of MicroProfile to Jakarta...." Which sounded like a pretty strong statement. Even after re-reading it, I don't feel my interpretation was unreasonable.

But thank you for clearing up my misunderstanding. Email can certainly be a poor communication channel sometimes.

For these reasons, I am against moving *any* specifications out of MicroProfile to Jakarta, although I am open to the idea of moving Jakarta specifications to MicroProfile. The exception is concurrency, which was always intended to move to Jakarta.

Back to the top