Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Moving MicroProfile JWT to JakartaSecurity?

[Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>]

Right, Jakarta Security, and yes, an implementation of MP JWT would be needed if referenced by Jakarta Security. That is what we would want as opposed to having two implementations in our containers that support both.

On Nov 11, 2022 at 8:56:08 AM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 6:18 AM Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It is an externally developed specification that describes a simple API for JWTs and integrations with CDI, not an implementation project. 

List your reasons why it cannot be consumed as such and extended in Java Security.

I'm not sure I follow. It's either in the Jakarta Security (not Java Security) spec or it's not. If it's not, users would have to add some implementation of MP JWT to their .war files. At that point it's not much different from adding say DeltaSpike, PrimeFaces, etc to a .war.

But maybe you meant something else there?

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev