Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [iot-pmc] PMC approval request for Eclipse Tahu release 1.0.0
Thanks for clarifying. I think that makes sense in this case.

Just to explain the reason for my question: traditionally a 1.0 release is accompanied by a "graduation review" [1]. That would, most likely, mean that there had been previous releases, and those would have been 0.x releases. I do believe that a 1.0 release should offer some kind of stability. Not only technically (like API, community, development process, …) But considering that there is the Sparkplug process backing this, I believe the situation is different here.

Good for me, but I would also like to give other PMC members the chance to speak up. If they don't in the next few days: +1 from me for the release.

[1]: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release-graduation

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:32 PM Wes Johnson <wes0johnson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jens,
    Comments inline below.


1)  I did notice that the project homepage you are pointing to, leads to an empty page: https://github.com/eclipse/tahu  -> https://eclipse.org/tahu -> https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project.php?id=iot.tahu
> I fixed this to redirect to the default project page for the time being


2) This is a 1.0 release, but I didn't see any previous releases. Starting out with a non 0.x release is ok in some cases (like a previous release outside of Eclipse), so I would like to understand the reasoning behind this.
> There are a couple of reasons for this. The first is that I didn't know this was a general expectation 0.x releases be officially released before a 1.0.0 release. The other is that the Eclipse Specification release process requires that a specification (Sparkplug v3.0.0 in this case), a TCK, and open source compatible implementation(s) all be available at the time of the release of the spec. Tahu is the implementation that coincides with the Sparkplug Specification v3.0.0 release. This is the first time that any open source implementation has been fully compliant with the spec which I thought deserved a 1.0.0 version.

Thanks,
Wes




On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:57 PM Wes Johnson <wes0johnson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,

I am requesting approval of Eclipse Tahu release 1.0.0.

Release review:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/iot.tahu/releases/1.0.0
Release review Gitlab ticket:
https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/emo/-/issues/396
IP Log: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24287

Thanks in advance,
Wes Johnson
Eclipse Tahu Project Co-Lead
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc



--
Jens Reimann
Principal Software Engineer / R&D Product Middleware
_____________________________________________________________________________

Red Hat GmbH, Registered seat: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Germany
Commercial register: Amtsgericht München/Munich, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross

_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc

_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc


--
Jens Reimann
Principal Software Engineer / R&D Product Middleware
_____________________________________________________________________________

Red Hat GmbH, Registered seat: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Germany
Commercial register: Amtsgericht München/Munich, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross

Back to the top