On 11/27/2013 02:57 PM, Oberhuber,
Martin wrote:
It’s
better to make it easier fit a user’s situation (type a or
type b, and allow easy turn-off of individual warnings that
annoy me).
I don't get the comment. JDT has already allowed to enable/disable
warnings for years. What do you think is missing to end-users when
it comes to configuring warnings?
Rather
than investing too much into a good single default.
Some (I tend to believe "many", but I have no proof) users stick to
default, and default configuration is what provides the first
experience and opinion on the package. Default behaviour and first
experience is something that has to be polished when it comes to
delivering a product. This ide-dev ML is all about improving the
User Experience for the Eclipse IDE by improving content of package,
default configuration, identifying the hot spots to improve all
IDE-related projects... Investing in choosing best, or should we say
to find out what IDE users think is best, defaults is IMO a very
relevant action in this context.
|