[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's
|
Within mobile/embedded, I would like to see those that leave be used for sessions that empower mobile and embedded in a meaningful way. Whether it's CDT, git, debugging, analysis, etc.
339/185 are closely related and suggest taking 339.
Peter Friese has 339 and 334. 334 looks to be more of a "making with Eclipse" type of talk and maybe it could be moved into the showcase or some other type of demo situation?
Open to ideas, but after 334, I didn't feel strongly on the M/E talks.
-E
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:49 PM, John Arthorne
<John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I guess in the end we can only pick 63,
given the five early birds and two director picks. Also note your list
has 20 for tools/other but Ian's only had 18.
Based on our review today of the available
submissions, I definitely think we need to give more to Tools. I'll just
throw out how I would allocate FWIW, based on the submissions we have (obviously
Doug and Ian have the final say here). Basically this removes 4 from modelling,
2 from mobile, and gives 6 more to tools/other.
Modelling - 15 + 1 early bird
Platform - 9 + 1 early bird
Mobile - 8
Tools/Other - 22 + 2 early bird
RT - 9 + 1 early bird
John
BTW, here’s the breakdown
by category of talks with > 3.5.
Modelling – 8 / 20
Platform – 8 / 10
Mobile – 3 / 10
Tools, Comm, Cool – 37 /
20
Eclipse RT – 7 / 10
From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:45 AM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's
Agreed, and we have already
started the horse trading.
By five, I mean talks with
a five vote but has been dragged down by a number of 2 and 3 votes. I’m
just trying to figure out what that means. We’ll go through some examples
at the meeting.
Doug.
From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:40 AM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:18 AM,
Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It’s easy to look yourselves.
Just sort by PC Vote and see what the top 63 are. Right now there’s a
big tie at 3.5. And we’re heavy in Tools and light in most of the others,
which is pretty normal since Tools is a grab bag.
I’m still munching through
some things to see how I want to present the list. I’ll set up a webex
for the meeting and we can look together.
Last year we went through the "5's"
fairly quickly. It was difficult to get the last 25% or so talks finalized...
but that's always how it is. I think people should be prepared to do some
horse-trading if they have some talks they really want to get in.
--
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
--
Eric Cloninger (
ericc@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Product Line Manager, MOTODEV Tools
Eclipse Sequoyah Project Lead
