|Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Next Planning Council call : May2|
I’m happy just branding it Eclipse IDE. Right now, it seems the market simply calls it “Eclipse”. Adding IDE is generic enough that it doesn’t disturb that and helps denote that what Eclipse thing we are talking about, even if there are other IDEs. Using some other name will just create confusion.
Mind you, the reason I would pick a Q name and stick with it is to merge the branding of the simrel with the branding of the product in a smooth transition. Most people will think it’s an Eclipse release that lasts forever and it will eventually lose that meaning and become the brand for the IDE. In theory…
Anyway, as Ed and Gunnar suggest, we should standardize the package names with Eclipse IDE. And, again, my main issue is what goes on the download page, in place of Eclipse Oxygen (and soon Eclipse Photon). Using Eclipse IDE there is probably fine too.