Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yep, me too.

Dani



From:      
 Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 Eclipse Planning Council
private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:      
 18.12.2015 02:59
Subject:    
   Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll
Sent by:    
   eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I'm just getting a 404 on that page.

Cheers,
Ian


On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Before I share the poll with a wider audience, here it
is:
https://www.eclipse.org/neon/planning/poll.php

You can drag/drop and rank the names.

If no strong objections are raised by tomorrow, we will
go with this approach.

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Nick Boldt <nickboldt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'd open the poll as soon as possible but leave it open
until at least
Jan 8 to give people time to ignore it over the holidays.

Unless you're worried about people gaming the system (vote early! vote
often!), in which case open it on Jan 4, and close it on Jan 8.

Either way, +1 for ranked ballots. "First past the post" is such
an
old, outdated way to get things done.

$0.05,

Nick

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:52 PM, David M Williams
<david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Why wouldn't they game the system. Some people just love doing that
sort of
> thing -- just to see if they can, I guess.
>
> Though I do *really* like the idea of "ranked voting" so
we have an
> automatic run-off.
>
> Should we wait to start the vote until "after the holidays"?
>
>
>
>
> From:        Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:        "eclipse.org-planning-council"
> <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Date:        12/16/2015 11:45 AM
> Subject:        [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Draft Neon+1 Names for the
> Poll
> Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Hey esteemed Planning Council members, I'm in the process starting
the poll
> for Neon+1
>
> Here are the names I have so far, please comment if you see any issues,
I
> tried to eliminate the ones I know would cause trademark issues.
>
> Oberon
> Oceana
> Odin
> Odyssey
> Ohm
> Olympus
> Opal
> Ophelia
> Oppenheimer
> Origami
> Orthosie
> Orpheus
> Osiris
> Oort
> Oxygen
> Ozone
>
> I'm also debating using a new polling system this year, that will
do things
> via a condorect style: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/
>
> Would anyone have objections to using the new poll system? It would
enable
> us to do a ranking style poll, the only downside is that people can
game the
> system if they changed IPs and constantly voted, but I don't think
we'll run
> into that issue.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Aniszczyk
> http://aniszczyk.org
>
> +1
512 961 6719_______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal
to the
> Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must
> contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxxto request removal.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal
to the
> Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must
> contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxxto request removal.



--
Nick Boldt :: Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio :: Red
Hat, Inc.
http://nick.divbyzero.com
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxxto request removal.



-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxxto request removal.



-- 
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com| http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.