[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll

I'd open the poll as soon as possible but leave it open until at least
Jan 8 to give people time to ignore it over the holidays.

Unless you're worried about people gaming the system (vote early! vote
often!), in which case open it on Jan 4, and close it on Jan 8.

Either way, +1 for ranked ballots. "First past the post" is such an
old, outdated way to get things done.

$0.05,

Nick

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:52 PM, David M Williams
<david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why wouldn't they game the system. Some people just love doing that sort of
> thing -- just to see if they can, I guess.
>
> Though I do *really* like the idea of "ranked voting" so we have an
> automatic run-off.
>
> Should we wait to start the vote until "after the holidays"?
>
>
>
>
> From:        Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:        "eclipse.org-planning-council"
> <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Date:        12/16/2015 11:45 AM
> Subject:        [eclipse.org-planning-council] Draft Neon+1 Names for the
> Poll
> Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Hey esteemed Planning Council members, I'm in the process starting the poll
> for Neon+1
>
> Here are the names I have so far, please comment if you see any issues, I
> tried to eliminate the ones I know would cause trademark issues.
>
> Oberon
> Oceana
> Odin
> Odyssey
> Ohm
> Olympus
> Opal
> Ophelia
> Oppenheimer
> Origami
> Orthosie
> Orpheus
> Osiris
> Oort
> Oxygen
> Ozone
>
> I'm also debating using a new polling system this year, that will do things
> via a condorect style: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/
>
> Would anyone have objections to using the new poll system? It would enable
> us to do a ranking style poll, the only downside is that people can game the
> system if they changed IPs and constantly voted, but I don't think we'll run
> into that issue.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Aniszczyk
> http://aniszczyk.org
>
> +1 512 961 6719_______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the
> Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must
> contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the
> Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must
> contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



-- 
Nick Boldt :: Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio :: Red Hat, Inc.
http://nick.divbyzero.com