[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll

Why wouldn't they game the system. Some people just love doing that sort of thing -- just to see if they can, I guess.

Though I do *really* like the idea of "ranked voting" so we have an automatic run-off.

Should we wait to start the vote until "after the holidays"?

From:        Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        12/16/2015 11:45 AM
Subject:        [eclipse.org-planning-council] Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll
Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hey esteemed Planning Council members, I'm in the process starting the poll for Neon+1

Here are the names I have so far, please comment if you see any issues, I tried to eliminate the ones I know would cause trademark issues.I'm also debating using a new polling system this year, that will do things via a condorect style: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/

Would anyone have objections to using the new poll system? It would enable us to do a ranking style poll, the only downside is that people can game the system if they changed IPs and constantly voted, but I don't think we'll run into that issue.


Chris Aniszczyk

+1 512 961 6719
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.