Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll

["David M Williams" <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Why wouldn't they game the system. Some
people just love doing that sort of thing -- just to see if they can, I
guess. 

Though I do *really* like the idea of
"ranked voting" so we have an automatic run-off. 

Should we wait to start the vote until
"after the holidays"? 




From:      
 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 "eclipse.org-planning-council"
<eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
Date:      
 12/16/2015 11:45 AM
Subject:    
   [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Draft Neon+1 Names for the Poll
Sent by:    
   eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hey esteemed Planning Council members, I'm in the process
starting the poll for Neon+1

Here are the names I have so far, please comment if you
see any issues, I tried to eliminate the ones I know would cause trademark
issues.

• Oberon
• Oceana
• Odin
• Odyssey
• Ohm
• Olympus
• Opal
• Ophelia
• Oppenheimer
• Origami
• Orthosie
• Orpheus
• Osiris
• Oort
• Oxygen
• Ozone

I'm also debating using a
new polling system this year, that will do things via a condorect style: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/

Would anyone have objections to using the new poll system?
It would enable us to do a ranking style poll, the only downside is that
people can game the system if they changed IPs and constantly voted, but
I don't think we'll run into that issue.

-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.