Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Automating quality gates on contr

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

The issue I see is that there is no strictly standardized header that is required across all repositories.  Eclipse Jetty is dual licensed so certainly not a standard block there.  I am not sure the value of something that simply scans for the words 'Eclipse Foundation' in a comment at the top of a file.

I think it is a part of the responsibilities of the project, we use a license checking maven plugin, and every new year we go through and update all the copyright dates as a part of the process, updating out base license template.

cheers,

Jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:46 PM Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:40 PM Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

What, specifically, are you frustrated by? Is it the response of the AC to this idea, the EMO, or both?

Both.

What, specifically, are your expectations? Based on the bug that you opened, it looks like you expect the EMO to run off and completely implement a solution based on a requirement described with a single sentence.

I'll clarify my expectations on the bug.

--

Mickael Istria

Eclipse IDE developer, for Red Hat Developers

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council