|Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Wording in the bylaw changes|
> May be should add "in coordination with EMO" at the end to > reflect/express that EMO is coordinating the document/efforts? FYI, that is already implied by the existing wording in Section 7.1 which says in part "... the EMO responsibilities shall include... leading the Eclipse Platform development, including execution and maintenance of the then current Eclipse Development Process...". I think that's sufficient. I realize that this is a little-known fact, but strictly speaking the Councils are actually part of the EMO. File that under "strange but true".
Back to the top