[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders
|
I'm good with any of the options, so
+1 on all three for me so long as we get reminders occasionally.
Brian Fitzpatrick
Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/25/2008 10:12 AM
|
Please respond to
"eclipse.org-architecture-council" <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "eclipse.org-architecture-council"
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council]
EAC Reminders |
|
Put me down as:
-1 Thursday
+1 Alternating
+1 Tuesday
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Oberhuber, Martin [mailto:Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:08 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders
Good to have some discussion!
One point about alternating is
that it's not only about remembering when
the next call is. It's also about
scheduling other calls, and seems to
create some ripple effect:
If it's important for me to regularly
join alternating AC meetings, then I
cannot organize standing meetings
on either Tuesday or Thursday.
Unless I'm OK with not joining
a standing meeting every 2 months.
But we have the voting system
for finding the best possible
compromise. If you can't ever
attend a meeting on Tuesday,
you can vote it -1. That is, you
have a +1/-1 vote for each of
the alternatives, giving 3 votes
in total which you can exercise
or not.
Assuming Neil's -1 for Tuesday
and Oliver's -1 for Thursday
(who said they definitely can't
join these days), we currently get:
+2 Thursday (Andrew, Jeff, Martin
- Oliver)
+3 Alternating (Jeff, Neil, Boris)
+3 Tuesday (Jeff, Oliver, Chris,
Martin - Neil)
I'm not in favor of re-voting
(in the interest of getting a decision
soon), but feel free to change
a vote or add one which you
have not exercised yet.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior
Member of Technical Staff, Wind
River
Target Management Project Lead,
DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Boris Bokowski
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:32 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders
+1 for alternating. With all the Google calendars we have
in place now for Eclipse related events, it should be possible to use a
more complicated call schedule.
Boris
Neil Hauge wrote:
> +1 for Alternating.
>
> If we don't alternate, then some will be forever unable to attend
on a
> set day. I would not be able to attend Tuesday at 11am due to
a
> standing PMC meeting. Alternating seems to be the most inclusive
option.
>
> I think if alternating is not the winner, we should have a re-vote
for
> Tuesday or Thursday to get a clear count. : ) In any case, my
secondary
> vote would be +1 for Keep Thursday._______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
