RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders

[DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx]

Put me down as:

 

-1 Thursday

+1 Alternating

+1 Tuesday

 

Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Oberhuber, Martin [mailto:Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:08 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders

Good to have some discussion!

 

One point about alternating is that it's not only about remembering when

the next call is. It's also about scheduling other calls, and seems to

create some ripple effect:

 

If it's important for me to regularly join alternating AC meetings, then I

cannot organize standing meetings on either Tuesday or Thursday.

Unless I'm OK with not joining a standing meeting every 2 months.

 

But we have the voting system for finding the best possible

compromise. If you can't ever attend a meeting on Tuesday,

you can vote it -1. That is, you have a +1/-1 vote for each of

the alternatives, giving 3 votes in total which you can exercise

or not.

 

Assuming Neil's -1 for Tuesday and Oliver's -1 for Thursday

(who said they definitely can't join these days), we currently get:

 

+2 Thursday (Andrew, Jeff, Martin - Oliver)

+3 Alternating (Jeff, Neil, Boris)

+3 Tuesday (Jeff, Oliver, Chris, Martin - Neil)

 

I'm not in favor of re-voting (in the interest of getting a decision

soon), but feel free to change a vote or add one which you

have not exercised yet.

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

---

From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Boris Bokowski
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:32 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders

+1 for alternating. With all the Google calendars we have in place now for Eclipse related events, it should be possible to use a more complicated call schedule.

Boris

Neil Hauge wrote:
> +1 for Alternating.
>
> If we don't alternate, then some will be forever unable to attend on a
> set day.  I would not be able to attend Tuesday at 11am due to a
> standing PMC meeting.  Alternating seems to be the most inclusive option.
>
> I think if alternating is not the winner, we should have a re-vote for
> Tuesday or Thursday to get a clear count. : )  In any case, my secondary
> vote would be +1 for Keep Thursday.